The 2019 assessment of CSEMP contaminant and biological effects data includes an assessment of the status and trends of imposex (VDS) in whelks at monitoring stations around the UK. Assessments are made for a large number of time series, each of VDS measurements in a single species at a single monitoring station. This document synthesises the results of the individual time series to assess the status and trends of VDS at the biogeographic regional level.
The regional assessment only considers coastal and offshore stations and excludes estuarine stations. The results are therefore based on the monitoring data collected within the waters assessed under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive. For simplicity, the term ‘region’ is used throughout to describe biogeographic regions. MSFD sub-regions are always referred to as such.
The following sections:
A time series of VDS measurements is assessed for status if:
A time series is also assessed for trends if:
The first tab below shows all the monitoring stations where there are individual time series assessments of trend or status for VDS. The purple circles are stations where there is a trend assessment and the light blue cirles are stations where there is only a status assessment, The areas delineated by the thinner black lines are the biogeographic regions; those delineated by the thicker black lines are the MSFD sub-regions.
The next set of tabs show the trend and status assessments for VDS. The colours have the following meaning:
And the shapes have the following meaning:
The final set of tabs give:
Number of time series with upwards, downwards or no trend by biogeographic region and MSFD sub-region
MSFD sub-region | biogeographic region | status | VDS |
---|---|---|---|
Greater North Sea | Northern North Sea | upward trend | 0 |
no trend | 7 | ||
downward trend | 4 | ||
E Channel | upward trend | 0 | |
no trend | 2 | ||
downward trend | 0 | ||
total | upward trend | 0 | |
no trend | 9 | ||
downward trend | 4 | ||
Celtic Seas | Scottish Continental Shelf | upward trend | 0 |
no trend | 9 | ||
downward trend | 13 | ||
Minches & W Scotland | upward trend | 0 | |
no trend | 2 | ||
downward trend | 1 | ||
Irish Sea | upward trend | 0 | |
no trend | 8 | ||
downward trend | 14 | ||
W Channel & Celtic Sea | upward trend | 0 | |
no trend | 2 | ||
downward trend | 0 | ||
total | upward trend | 0 | |
no trend | 21 | ||
downward trend | 28 |
Proportion of time series with upwards, downwards or no trend by biogeographic region and MSFD sub-region
MSFD sub-region | biogeographic region | status | VDS |
---|---|---|---|
Greater North Sea | Northern North Sea | upward trend | 0 |
no trend | 64 | ||
downward trend | 36 | ||
E Channel | upward trend | 0 | |
no trend | 100 | ||
downward trend | 0 | ||
total | upward trend | 0 | |
no trend | 69 | ||
downward trend | 31 | ||
Celtic Seas | Scottish Continental Shelf | upward trend | 0 |
no trend | 41 | ||
downward trend | 59 | ||
Minches & W Scotland | upward trend | 0 | |
no trend | 67 | ||
downward trend | 33 | ||
Irish Sea | upward trend | 0 | |
no trend | 36 | ||
downward trend | 64 | ||
W Channel & Celtic Sea | upward trend | 0 | |
no trend | 100 | ||
downward trend | 0 | ||
total | upward trend | 0 | |
no trend | 43 | ||
downward trend | 57 |
Number of time series with each status by biogeographic region and MSFD sub-region
MSFD sub-region | biogeographic region | status | VDS |
---|---|---|---|
Greater North Sea | Northern North Sea | blue | 0 |
green | 11 | ||
red | 2 | ||
E Channel | blue | 0 | |
green | 1 | ||
red | 1 | ||
total | blue | 0 | |
green | 12 | ||
red | 3 | ||
Celtic Seas | Scottish Continental Shelf | blue | 7 |
green | 14 | ||
red | 1 | ||
Minches & W Scotland | blue | 2 | |
green | 0 | ||
red | 1 | ||
Irish Sea | blue | 13 | |
green | 7 | ||
red | 2 | ||
W Channel & Celtic Sea | blue | 0 | |
green | 1 | ||
red | 1 | ||
total | blue | 22 | |
green | 22 | ||
red | 5 |
Proportion of time series with each status by biogeographic region and MSFD sub-region
MSFD sub-region | biogeographic region | status | VDS |
---|---|---|---|
Greater North Sea | Northern North Sea | blue | 0 |
green | 85 | ||
red | 15 | ||
E Channel | blue | 0 | |
green | 50 | ||
red | 50 | ||
total | blue | 0 | |
green | 80 | ||
red | 20 | ||
Celtic Seas | Scottish Continental Shelf | blue | 32 |
green | 64 | ||
red | 4 | ||
Minches & W Scotland | blue | 67 | |
green | 0 | ||
red | 33 | ||
Irish Sea | blue | 59 | |
green | 32 | ||
red | 9 | ||
W Channel & Celtic Sea | blue | 0 | |
green | 50 | ||
red | 50 | ||
total | blue | 45 | |
green | 45 | ||
red | 10 |
Tabulating the number of time series with each status category by region provides a quick summary of the individual time series results. However, it does not provide an objective regional assessment of status. Similarly, tabulating the number of time series with an upward or downward trend does not provide an objective regional assessment of trend. This section describes how the individual time series results can by synthesised in a meta-analysis to assess both status and trend at the regional level.
For a regional trend assessment, the trend in each time series is summarised by the estimated odds ratio of the VDS of an individual whelk being above the EAC in one year relative to the previous year. Values of 1 indicate no trend; i.e. the odds of an individual being above the EAC in one year are the same as in the year before. Values < 1 indicate that the odds of being above the EAC in one year are lower than in the year before, so there is a decline in the level of imposex. Conversely, values > 1 indicate an increase in the level of imposex. Regional trends are then estimated by fitting the following linear mixed model by restricted maximum likelihood:
The fixed model means that a trend is estimated for each region. The random model has two terms:
The meta-analysis is restricted to time series from monitoring stations that are classified as ‘representative’ or ‘impacted’ (those close to a point source). ‘Baseline’ stations (those with near pristine conditions or only subject to very diffuse inputs) are omitted because any trends there will likely be caused by different processes to those at representative or impacted stations. Note that the inclusion of impacted stations differs from the approach used for contaminants (where they are excluded). Many imposex monitoring stations were chosen because they were close to harbours (i.e. impacted). However, the ban of TBT (which causes imposex) will have been the major driver of trends in imposex throughout UK waters, so it seems plausible that trends in VDS might be similar (on the logistic scale) at both impacted and representative stations.
The meta-analysis is further restricted to regions with at least three trend stations with good geographic spread. Three stations is considered the minimum required to provide some sort of evidence base at the regional level.
For a regional status assessment, the status of each time series is summarised by the ratio between the estimated mean VDS in the final monitoring year and the assessment critrion. This ensures that status is always measured on the same scale, even though the assessment criterion might vary between time series (because VDS is measured in a different species). The ratio is transformed to the square root scale (to better satisfy modelling distributional assumptions) and essentially the same linear mixed model as for trends is then fitted:
where status estimation variation is the variation in the status estimates from the individual time series analysis, assumed known and fixed.
There are no restrictions on the time series used in the status meta-analysis based on the classification of the monitoring station; time series from baseline, representative and impacted stations are all included.
Again, the meta-analysis is restricted to regions with at least three status stations with good geographic spread.
The results of the status regional assessment are back-transformed for presentation. A value of 1 indicates that the regional mean VDS is equal to the assessment criterion; a value of 0.5 indicates that it is half the assessment criterion; and a value of 2 indicates that it is twice the assessment criterion. There is no need to back-transform the estimated regional trend, which is on the odds ratio scale.
This section provides more detail on the number and geographic spread of the time series available for the meta-analyses. The map shows the stations with parametric trend and status assessments having excluded trend assessments at baseline stations. The purple circles are stations where there is a trend assessment and the light blue cirles are stations where there is only a status assessment,
The following regions have an insufficient number or time series or spread of stations and are excluded from the regional assessment:
The first 2 tabs show:
The symbols in all these plots have the following interpretation:
The final tab shows the estimates of the regional trend in VDS.
This table shows the estimates of the regional trend:
biogeographic region | trend | se | lower | upper |
---|---|---|---|---|
Northern North Sea | 0.77 | 0.07 | 0.63 | 0.92 |
Minches & W Scotland | 0.39 | 0.14 | 0.11 | 0.66 |
Irish Sea | 0.52 | 0.05 | 0.42 | 0.62 |
The first 2 tabs show:
The symbols in all the plots have the following interpretation:
Note that to see why some points are coloured blue, it is necessary to look ahead to the next section, where status is compared to the BAC. Unfortunately, it isn’t easy to present the assessment of status relative to the EAC with the assessment of status relative to the BAC because the ratio of the BAC to the EAC can vary between species.
The final tab shows the estimates of the regional status in VDS.
This table shows the estimates of the regional status:
biogeographic region | status | se | upper | VDS | VDS upper |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Northern North Sea | 0.54 | 0.10 | 0.70 | 0.29 | 0.49 |
Minches & W Scotland | 0.29 | 0.17 | 0.57 | 0.08 | 0.33 |
Irish Sea | 0.19 | 0.07 | 0.30 | 0.04 | 0.09 |
The first 2 tabs show:
The symbols in all the plots have the following interpretation:
The final tab shows the estimates of the regional status in VDS.
This table shows the estimates of the regional status:
biogeographic region | status | se | upper | VDS | VDS upper |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Northern North Sea | 1.39 | 0.25 | 1.80 | 1.93 | 3.23 |
Minches & W Scotland | 0.75 | 0.44 | 1.47 | 0.56 | 2.17 |
Irish Sea | 0.48 | 0.17 | 0.77 | 0.23 | 0.59 |